Comply with me……..

I have very few equals when it comes to my contempt for the TSA and its fake-security theater. I opted out of flying altogether quite some time ago, because I will not subject myself to demeaning treatment for the appearance of security.

The voices against the TSA and its policies of Gestapo-like treatment of ordinary citizens are getting louder all the time. I’ve been waiting for you people to catch on for a while.

I did get a chuckle out of this lovely bit of YouTube wankery:

Welcome to the party, folks. Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson would be appalled at this stuff. You should be, as well.

Posted in Good Grief!, The Deep End | Leave a comment

I don’t collect butterflies.

Polyominoes I really hate the word ‘capture’ when applied to photography. There is an implication that the photographer is collecting images with a net, as one might butterflies. This is an insult to anyone who works at the art and craft of photography. Most serious photographers I know work hard to get their photos, and suggesting that they sat around with a camera and waited for a photograph to come to them is just plain wrong. The usage of capture we are discussing appears fourth in the list of definitions at dictionary.com; the primary definition is “to take by force”

Here’s the full list:

cap·ture

–verb (used with object)
1. to take by force or stratagem; take prisoner; seize: The police captured the burglar.

2. to gain control of or exert influence over: an ad that captured our attention; a TV show that captured 30% of the prime-time audience.

3. to take possession of, as in a game or contest: to capture a pawn in chess.

4. to represent or record in lasting form: The movie succeeded in capturing the atmosphere of Berlin in the 1930s.

5. Computers.
a. to enter (data) into a computer for processing or storage.
b. to record (data) in preparation for such entry.

Please try to find an appropriate comment when you are looking at someone’s photography. Saying “Nice capture” is intellectually lazy and faux-pretentious.

That’s my rant for today. Tune in next time for something else.

Posted in General stuff, Photography | Leave a comment

36 lessons

Mongo
I have put up a set detailing some lessons I have learned in 40 years as an amateur photographer here on Flickr. Please feel free to stop by and comment :)

Posted in General stuff, Other blogs, Photography | Leave a comment

There’s something in my eye.

Posted in General stuff, The Deep End | Leave a comment

Terror Quiz

Terror Quiz

Posted in General stuff | Leave a comment

Karma

I got a little bit of it on the way back from Delaware over the weekend. I was cruising in traffic on the PA turnpike, and came upon a 55 MPH zone. Slowing down for the speed zone produced an angry series of light flashes and horn honks from the jerk behind me.

Finally, a break in the left lane allowed him to stomp on the gas, shoot by me , and give me the finger. All right in front of a Pennsylvania State trooper.

I think his vacation ended right there under the big yellow sign that said “TARGETED ENFORCEMENT AREA”. Sometimes, folks, the signs mean what they say.

Posted in General stuff | Leave a comment

Escape from pigment prison

I threw away my photo printer today.

When I purchased it (a Canon ip7600) the ink cartridges cost 9.99 each.

I saw one today for $18.00.

It seems like more and more, when I turn the printer on it wants a couple of cartridges replaced. I’m not going to pay $36 to turn on the printer when I can get almost 100 prints made at Walmart for the cost of turning on the damn printer here.

There are a lot of places I can get an 8×10 print made for 1.99.

Don’t get suckered into buying a color printer, folks.

That tablespoon (or so) of ink in the cartridge works out to ink at $4,608 a gallon.

India ink bought at Amazon.com comes in a 2 oz. bottle for $3.15. That’s a far more reasonable $201.60 a gallon. If you can call that reasonable.

Greedy Corporations suck. I’m looking at you, Lexmark, Canon, and HP. There’s no possible reason that the cartridges couldn’t retail for 6 or 7 dollars, based on materials cost.

You created the ink refill business by charging the prices you have. Drop your DRM on printer and cartridges, charge a fair price for the ink, and cartridge refillers will go out of business. Are you really too stupid to see this?

I imagine you are.

Posted in Good Grief!, Photography | 1 Comment

Doing the math

So, it costs Netflix about a nickel to stream an HD movie to your computer.

This set me off on a train of thought…

I looked up the size of an HD movie. It appears that such a movie represents about 4 to 8 GB of data in uncompressed form, and compressed for over-the-net viewing it might weigh in at an off-the-cuff average of 2 GB of actual transmitted data. That’s 230 * 2, or 2,147,483,648 bytes of Data.

Twitter, as most geeks seem to know, is limited to 140 bytes (characters) per message. Why is this? It’s because that’s the message limit for an SMS text message as defined by the telephone companies.

So, an HD movie is the data equivalent of roughly 15,339,168 text messages. The phone companies seen to charge about 20 cents per text message across the board, data plans notwithstanding.

At that price, the phone companies think it’s worth $3,067,833.78 to stream that HD movie.

That same 140 bytes of data costs Netflix about 3.25*10-9 cents.

That’s 0.00000000325 cents.

So, in terms of actual costs, a text message costs virtually nothing to send. Or you could say that it costs about one cent per 4 million text messages.

If you are a world-class text messager, you might be able to send about 1200 text messages a day., let’s say 35,000 or so a month. (There have been higher counts recorded!)

Text messaging plans are the worst deals on the planet. Printer ink? Pikers. For corruption and sheer craven greed, no one beats the telcos.

Posted in General stuff, Good Grief!, The Deep End | 1 Comment

Swoopy!

Swoopy Benches I very much like the new 100 Acres Art & Nature park west of the Indianapolis Art Museum proper on 38th street. It’s a visual feast, and has interesting art scattered throughout its environs.

The photo is of Jeppe Hein’s Bench Around the Lake, a wonderfully whimsical set of swoopy benches that seem to spring out of the earth in places around the lake, do odd things, and disappear again. The only thing I have against them is that they are a photographically hideous shade of yellow, which pretty much knocks them out of the running for anything except black-and-white portraiture.

Oh well.

Posted in General stuff, Photography, Places | Leave a comment

Insulting

I just received this (redacted) email on Flickr:

Dear Phil Jern,
My name is Sandra Gxxxxxx and I am an editor at www.gpsmycity.com. We are currently compiling a self-guided walking tour to Indianapolis that will be published on out site www.gpsmycity.com as well as in an iPhone application.
We hereby seek your permission to use one of your photos of Lady Spray Fountain on Flickr.com as part of the tour guide in question. The photo we need is:
www.flickr.com/photos/pjern/4797268948/
Naturally, we intend to credit you fully for the authorship of this photograph.
I thank you in advance for your permission and look forward to hearing from you soon.

People need to get out of the habit of thinking that they’re entitled to other people’s work for free if they intend to resell it. I visited the site mentioned, and found out that they’re selling iphone apps.

I was offended by the tone of “Oh we’ll give you credit” and thanking me in advance for my permission, (which isn’t likely to happen ever!).

Greedy people suck.

Posted in Good Grief!, Photography | Leave a comment